Dangerous Times for Israel
Summary ... American policies in the Bush Administration's final stretch have two main parallel objectives: To enlist the support of Arab states for control in Iraq and to prevent Shi'ite control of the Middle East and its oil reserves. In other words, Israel will find itself in a situation it has always tried to avoid: Isolated in an international forum whose composition is bad.
American efforts to placate Arab world may come at Israel's expense
For the first time in years the US and Israel are not seeing eye to eye regarding key issues. American policies in the Bush Administration's final stretch have two main parallel objectives: To enlist the support of "moderate" Arab states, primarily Saudi Arabia, for the sake of achieving calm in Iraq (perhaps the aggressive address delivered by the Saudi king against the US will dissipate this illusion,) and to prevent Shiite control of the Middle East and its oil reserves.
Although these two objectives are not connected to the Israeli-"Palestinian" conflict, the battered Administration has been forced to change its policies and to accommodate new ones, including the European Union's argument that that a connection should be naturally created between the two issues to placate Saudi Arabia and the Arab world in general.
In other words: Any type of advancement, even if just optical, on the Israeli-"Palestinian" issue is likely to serve the Americans as a lifeline on other fronts.
The problem is that the American lifeline is likely to turn into a burden from Israel's point of view. Israel, no less then the US and perhaps more so, is seeking the same objectives: Peace with the Arab world and the curbing of Iranian armament but not at the hefty cost demanded by the Riyadh conference participants, for example.
Nonetheless, Olmert has already been forced to agree to a meeting with "Palestinian" leader Mahmoud Abbas, although Abbas is continuing to breach all his commitments, and despite the fact that since the establishment of the "unity government" he has in fact turned into Hamas' yes man.
These pressures will grow if the tendency to push Israel to accept the Saudi Initiative is accelerated.
Diplomatic situation more complex than ever
A lot of nonsense regarding this initiative has been sounded, while ignoring the fact that its objective is to diplomatically achieve everything the Arab world was unable to achieve through war and terror: The return of refugees and return to the borders of June 4, 1967 that invited aggression. And let's not delude ourselves: The Arabs are not relating to these issues as points for negotiation, but rather, as a pre-condition to their actual willingness to engage in talks.
Their refusal to make any amendments to the plan only confirms it. Beyond this, it's also about future moves: Convening a conference attended by the international Quartet (US, Europe, Russia and the UN,) the "Palestinians" (namely, the Hamas government), and another new creature called "The Arab Quartet" (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates.)
In other words, Israel will find itself in a situation it has always tried to avoid: Isolated in an international forum whose composition is bad. Although there is no doubting the US' basic friendship, in the wake of its other problems there is no guarantee that America would want to stand up against other participants at such a conference.
How did we reach this grim situation? Israel's political and diplomatic activities in the past year have been rife with failures and errors. Whether this is due to lack of experience or neglect, Israel's diplomatic situation is more complex today than ever, particularly at a time so crucial for its future.
But you will not go out in haste, nor will you go as fugitives; for the Lord will go before you, and the God of Israel will be your rear guard. Isaiah 52:12
[ Published: April 14, 2007 ]
Islam as a religion and Muslims as a group have continued to ignore Jerusalem as a non-entity and continue to bow toward Mecca when they pray. However, the myth that the Temple Mount is actually the place of Mohammed's alleged ascent continues to exist. That myth has become factual history, as the Arab/Muslims claim that the Jews' most holy site, built thousands of years before Christianity or the beginnings of Islam belongs to Islam. And the West continues to believe the myth as the Mullahs babble about their non-existent history, harking back to the Philistines and other tribes long gone.
Hamas explains general principles and objectives in 42-article document.
PA/PLO leader Abbas seems intentionally to ignore that he and his PA/PLO are responsible for the violence, as a result of their daily incitement against Israel. A recent poll found that approximately half of 'Palestinians' believe the "Intifada" should lead to the destruction of Israel.
This is an account of what happened in Halamish last Friday night, July 21, 2017, as told by a neighbor of the Solomon family, who lives three doors away from where the terror attack took place.
The tragedy of the pro-'Palestinian' movement is its attachment to a single narrative: "Look at how wretched the lives of the 'Palestinian' people are," they tell us, "It is because of Israeli oppression." Because this narrative must be constantly reinforced, there is little room for real reporting about the failures of the 'Palestinian' leadership and the corruption and infighting that have caused the 'West Bank' [i.e., Judea & Samaria] and Gaza to languish.
The Arab leadership is attempting to portray the current Intifada as a kind of popular, spontaneous struggle that expresses the population's despair over the political situation. In reality, it is an Intifada supported and directed by the Arab leadership of the PA/PLO-Fatah and Hamas.
US Jewish leaders blew it recently when what was a rare opportunity to ask the US president face-to-face to release Jonathan Pollard, they didn't even consider the matter as being a priority.
Obama needs to wake up. The real enemy is not Netanyahu. The real enemy is Iran, Hizb'Allah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Islamic State, and the establishment of a terrorist state in the midst of Israel.
It's no state secret that US President Barack Obama is not a huge fan of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. His distain for the Jewish leader is well-known throughout the world; he's never tried to hide it. But now that Israel is having new elections in March does it mean Obama could, either directly or indirectly, influence the elections in Israel in order to obtain a defeat for Netanyahu?