Answering Pope Francis's Auschwitz

[Rafael Medoff]

Video: "One Flight For Us"

Summary ... The rampant anti-Semitism of Adolph Hitler and the Third Reich was also very much alive in the U.S. administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt, as well as Britain and the other Allies.

{Note: The article and the video below it are unrelated as far as authors. However, the video adds much to the author's explanation given to the Pope. It's very enlightening, presenting actual facts that are hard to comprehend, especially for admirers of many of the U.S. leaders at the time.—ed]

The great powers had photographs of the railway routes that the trains took to ... Auschwitz," Pope Francis remarked [recently] External link.

"Tell me," he asked, "why didn't they bomb them?"

The pontiff's question is not merely a matter of historical curiosity. It raises issues of morality, diplomacy, and American foreign policy with profound implications for our own times.

The reason the Allies had photos of the railways leading to Auschwitz is that throughout the spring of 1944, Allied planes conducted surveillance of the area in preparation for bombing German oil factories, some of which were less than five miles from the gas chambers and crematoria.

Yet when Jewish organizations asked the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration to bomb the railway lines or the death camp itself, U.S. officials replied that such an operation was not feasible because it would require "diverting" planes from the battlefield. That was false; those oil factories were very much a part of the battlefield.

Train tracks leading into Auschwitz
Train tracks leading into Auschwitz [Credit: Rebecca Lang]
Ironically, the administration did repeatedly divert military resources or change military plans for other non-military objectives — just not for the Jews. For example, an Air Force plan to bomb the Japanese city of Kyoto was blocked by Secretary of War Henry Stimson because he admired the city's artistic treasures. Assistant Secretary of War McCloy diverted American bombers from striking the German city of Rothenburg in order to spare its famous medieval architecture. Allied ships were diverted to bring thousands of Muslims on a religious pilgrimage to Mecca in 1943 — at the same time U.S. officials were saying no ships were available to take Jewish refugees out of Europe.

The Roosevelt administration opposed calls by Jewish groups to create a government agency to rescue Jewish refugees — but it established a government agency "for the protection and salvage of artistic and historic monuments in Europe." (That episode was chronicled in the recent George Clooney film, "Monuments Men.") [Seems art was more precious to the U.S. leadership than Jewish lives.—ed] General George Patton even diverted U.S. troops to rescue 150 of the prized Lipizzaner dancing horses in Austria, in April 1945.

Along these same lines, Pope Francis might ask Vatican historians about Allied policy concerning the bombing of Rome. In the summer of 1943, the Allied High Command was anxious to bomb Rome, since it was, as the New York Times put it, "a railway and communications center for Germany and Italian war material." But Roosevelt feared Catholic voters would blame him if religious sites were damaged or if many civilians were harmed, so a slew of changes and restrictions were imposed on the military.

Leaflets were dropped on the city the day before the attack, warning that bombing was imminent, thus surrendering the advantage of surprise. The bombing was carried out in broad daylight, increasing the danger to the pilots' lives, in order to make it easier to avoid religious shrines. The bombing crews were given maps showing religious and cultural buildings to be avoided, with the words "Must Not Be Harmed" stamped in large red letters. The bombardiers were ordered to refrain from dropping bombs if there was "any doubt" as to where the bombs would land.

Why the double standard? Why was the Roosevelt administration willing to undertake diversions from standard military policy when medieval artwork, or dancing horses, or Catholic shrines were in danger, but — as Pope Francis noted this week — it refused to "divert" a few bombs to strike the railways that were bringing hundreds of thousands of Jews to their deaths?

Internal memoranda between senior officials of the Roosevelt State Department during 1941-1943 — the peak of the Holocaust — provide the tragic answer. One official, Cavendish Cannon, opposed rescuing Jews from Rumania because it was "likely to bring about new pressure for an asylum in the western hemisphere ... a migration of the Rumanian Jews would therefore open the question of similar treatment for Jews in Hungary and, by extension, all countries where there has been intense persecution." His colleague Robert Alexander opposed rescuing Jews on the grounds that it would "take the burden and the curse off Hitler." [As shown in the video below, Hitler did not start out to murder the Jews, only to remove them from Europe. Once he saw the Allies didn't want them either, the Final Solution was developed.—ed] And R. Borden Reams warned of "the danger that the German government might agree to turn over to the United States and to Great Britain a large number of Jewish refugees." [the "danger"?—ed] An administration that viewed Jewish refugees as a "curse" and a "burden" was not going to take any steps that would leave it with large numbers of Jewish refugees on its hands.

Pope Francis made his Auschwitz remark while speaking to a group of young people about why they "find it hard to trust the world." He was right — but why cite only the 1940s? Young people today see how the international community lets the architect of the Darfur genocide walk free, accuses Israel of war crimes for defending itself against war crimes, and yawns as the Syrian regime uses chemical weapons against civilians. It's no easier to "trust the world" today than it was during the Holocaust.

[Links and emphasis added]

[ Published: June 29, 2015 ]


"One Flight For Us"

A film by Haim Hecht

This film is based on research and evidence that prove beyond doubt that the allies, led by the US and Britain, knew of the destruction of Europe's Jews and remained silent.

Even while in Auschwitz crematorium and the railroads leading to the camp were within the range of US planes, there wasn't even 'one flight for us' [the Jews], one flight designated to bomb the ovens and railroads, thus stopping the destruction of the Jews. Brig. General Amir Eshel, an air force pilot who has learned this period of history, initiated and realized "One Flight For Us", a formation of three F-15s of the Israeli air force flying over Auschwitz.

This formation signed a clear statement in the sky — Never again!

It's important to take the time to see the entire video. You won't regret it. [55 min.]




Keep current with these articles

Sign up to receive free e-mail alerts.

  

Need to find additional information?



In Depth Analysis

The Myth of Al Aqsa Mosque

Islam as a religion and Muslims as a group have continued to ignore Jerusalem as a non-entity and continue to bow toward Mecca when they pray. However, the myth that the Temple Mount is actually the place of Mohammed's alleged ascent continues to exist. That myth has become factual history, as the Arab/Muslims claim that the Jews' most holy site, built thousands of years before Christianity or the beginnings of Islam belongs to Islam. And the West continues to believe the myth as the Mullahs babble about their non-existent history, harking back to the Philistines and other tribes long gone.

Hamas Document - 2017

Hamas explains general principles and objectives in 42-article document.

The Real Goal of the 'Palestinian' Intifada

PA/PLO leader Abbas seems intentionally to ignore that he and his PA/PLO are responsible for the violence, as a result of their daily incitement against Israel. A recent poll found that approximately half of 'Palestinians' believe the "Intifada" should lead to the destruction of Israel.

Emet Blog

Three Doors Down in Halamish

This is an account of what happened in Halamish last Friday night, July 21, 2017, as told by a neighbor of the Solomon family, who lives three doors away from where the terror attack took place.

The 'Palestinian' News You Don't See

The tragedy of the pro-'Palestinian' movement is its attachment to a single narrative: "Look at how wretched the lives of the 'Palestinian' people are," they tell us, "It is because of Israeli oppression." Because this narrative must be constantly reinforced, there is little room for real reporting about the failures of the 'Palestinian' leadership and the corruption and infighting that have caused the 'West Bank' [i.e., Judea & Samaria] and Gaza to languish.

The "Spontaneous" Intifada Is Orchestrated by the Palestinian Leadership

The Arab leadership is attempting to portray the current Intifada as a kind of popular, spontaneous struggle that expresses the population's despair over the political situation. In reality, it is an Intifada supported and directed by the Arab leadership of the PA/PLO-Fatah and Hamas.

Views/Commentary

A Matter of Priority - The Jonathan Pollard Case

US Jewish leaders blew it recently when what was a rare opportunity to ask the US president face-to-face to release Jonathan Pollard, they didn't even consider the matter as being a priority.

Obama Declares War on Israel

Obama needs to wake up. The real enemy is not Netanyahu. The real enemy is Iran, Hizb'Allah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Islamic State, and the establishment of a terrorist state in the midst of Israel.

Could Barak Obama Swing the Upcoming Israeli Election?

It's no state secret that US President Barack Obama is not a huge fan of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. His distain for the Jewish leader is well-known throughout the world; he's never tried to hide it. But now that Israel is having new elections in March does it mean Obama could, either directly or indirectly, influence the elections in Israel in order to obtain a defeat for Netanyahu?